Today is Election Day in Lake County. Polls are open 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Find your precinct at lakevotes.gov.

DocketHeron

your local government, delivered weekly.

Patrick DeGrave

Fruitland Park City Commission: Vice Mayor, District 1

Seat as listed on the city's council page, read 2026-11-03.

Record

Meetings attended 32 of 33Arrived late 0Motions made 71Motions seconded 24Split votes 4Recorded no votes 0

Counted from the Fruitland Park City Commission minutes posted by the city, 2025-01-09 to 2026-10-08. Minutes post weeks after each meeting; the most recent meetings are not yet included.

Split votes and attendance (5)

2026-10-08 Vote
Split vote 4-1; the council to DENY the final reading of Ordinance 2026-011. Mayor Cheshire called for public comments. James P. Logan, owner of property adjacent to the proposed annexation, expressed support for the project. He stated that, as a nearby resident, he would be directly impacted by the development and expressed confidence in the developer. He requested that the City Commission reconsider its decision to deny the annexation. Richard Wohlfarth, Developer, provided a presentation outlining the proposed annexation, noting that one parcel is a complete enclave and another is a partial enclave. He clarified that the Commission's consideration was limited to annexation of the parcel entirely surrounded by City limits. He discussed his collaboration with Mr. Logan and the City in securing property for a future water treatment plant and addressed existing water consumption and capacity. He indicated that land use and zoning matters would be presented for consideration at a future meeting. Mr. Wohlfarth noted that his team would be willing to meet with Lake County to support signalization at South Grays Airport Road and US 441. He requested reconsideration to table the item to the December meeting. Page3of8 October 8, 2026, Regular Minutes Mayor Cheshire expressed surprise that the annexation was placed on the agenda prior to the November 3 election, given the Commission's previously expressed concerns regarding Amendment 3. Commissioner Raysin expressed concern about the traffic issues that would be created by the proposed development. Mr. Wohlfarth commented that if the item were tabled, he would return to the commission with a proposed solution for the flow traffic. He acknowledged the issue with trying to get out onto US 441 from S Grays Airport Road. Mr. Raysin asked if there was any alternate access points. Mr. Wohlfarth said there may be an opportunity to use Register Road, and the developer would be amenable to making that connection immediately. Carl Yauk, 1123 Ritter Road, expressed opposition to the annexation and objected to tabling the ordinance. Mitchell Langley, 101 S. Valley Road, opposed the annexation, discussed ordinance adoption procedures, and referenced a recent annexation lawsuit involving the Town of Lady Lake. Mayor Cheshire asked City Attorney Geraci-Carver to explain the ordinance adoption process under Florida Statutes. Ms. Geraci-Carver stated that she was unaware of any statutory requirements inconsistent with the City's established procedures. Source
2026-06-11 Vote
Split vote 3-1; the council to approve the Second Reading of Ordinance 2025-025. During public comment, several residents raised concerns about annexation, infrastructure, and growth management. Carl Yauk, 1123 Ritter Road, questioned whether the City was legally required to approve the annexation, to which City Attorney Anita Geraci-Carver clarified that approval is not mandatory. He also raised concerns regarding traffic impacts, school overcrowding, and how growth decisions are made in Fruitland Park. Additional speakers focused on infrastructure and capacity concerns. Chuck Padgett, 1740 Myrtle Lake Avenue, criticized the parking design, arguing that the proposed spaces would Page 5 of 9 June 11, 2026, Regular Minutes not accommodate the number of vehicles anticipated, and urged developers to contribute more toward road improvements. Source
2026-06-11 Vote
Split vote 3-1; the council to approve the Second Reading of Ordinance 2025-026. Source
2026-06-11 Vote
Split vote 3-1; the council to approve the Second Reading of Ordinance 2025-027. Mayor Cheshire called for public comments. Sarah McCallum again voiced concerns regarding the annexation notices and the broader tax implications of the proposed development. She argued that converting a commercially zoned C-2 parcel to residential use was not in the City’s best interest, particularly given existing tax concerns. She stressed the importance of evaluating the City’s overall tax base and urged the Commission to reject the commercial zoning change. Carl Yauk reiterated his concern about who should guide growth in Fruitland Park, questioning whether decisions should be made by developers or by the residents and the City’s long-term interests. Responding to the concerns, Richard Wohlfarth, representing the applicant, clarified that the C-2 parcel in question is primarily frontage that will become right of way. He stated that while the project could result in an estimated 30% reduction in potential tax revenue, the Page 7 of 9 June 11, 2026, Regular Minutes development would still provide a net tax benefit to the City. Addressing infrastructure concerns, he explained that the existing water plant has adequate capacity, with the primary issue being system redundancy. He noted the new water plant would address that need for both current and future developments. Mr. Wohlfarth added that construction is anticipated to begin in January, with the subdivision taking approximately one year to complete, meaning the first residential units would likely not be available until 2028. He also responded to concerns regarding driveway and parking capacity, stating the design would provide adequate room for vehicles. Vice Mayor Patrick DeGrave asked about language in the Master Development Agreement (MDA) concerning infrastructure, specifically sewer capacity, and questioned how the development would proceed if the sewer plant is not yet operational. Mr. Wohlfarth explained that the MDA provides that capacity is not reserved or guaranteed until a developer or builder pays for it, meaning they do not secure ownership of that capacity in advance. Several residents spoke in opposition to continued development and annexation, emphasizing concerns about infrastructure, community character, and quality of life. Mitchell Langley stated that development is moving forward without infrastructure being prioritized and urged the City Commission to put residents’ interests first. Ken Hutchinson, 107 E Lavista Street, expressed frustration that while more development is being proposed, existing areas within Fruitland Park are being neglected and deteriorating. Chuck Padgett referenced previously approved developments near his home, describing them as an eyesore, and thanked Mayor Chris Cheshire for opposing the Vita Serena ordinances. Vincent Polite, 1908 Bell Creek Loop, spoke in favor of preserving Fruitland Park’s small- town character, urging the City to focus on resolving current issues rather than approving more growth. He later questioned how much outreach commissioners had done with constituents before placing the item on the agenda. Shayna Grunewald, 929 Hawk Landing, argued that residents’ preferences for larger lots are often ignored by developers and said the annexation itself is the central issue. Source
2025-12-11 Attendance
Recorded absent from the City Commission meeting (regular). Source

All motions made and seconded (95)

2026-10-08 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-10-08 Motion
Moved; the council to TABLE Ordinance 2026-014,as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-10-08 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the final reading of Ordinance 2026-015, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-10-08 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the final reading of Ordinance 2026-016, as presented. Mitchell Langley, 101 S Valley Road, spoke in opposition to approving the ordinance at this time. Mayor Cheshire asked that monthly financial reports be provided to the City Commission. He also asked Ms. Manila about the audit, and she stated the auditors had recently asked for additional documents, but they are working to finalize the audit. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-09-10 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Resolution 2026-046, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-09-10 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Ordinance 2026-015, on first reading. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-09-10 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the first reading of Ordinance 2026-011. Mike Stefonek, 36836 Skycrest Blvd, e xpressed concerns about traffi c, and he was not in support of the project. Mitchell Langley, 101 S. Valley Road, raised concerns regarding the potential for rental properties within the development and emphasized the importance of maintaining opportunities for homeownership in Fruitland Park. Carl Yauk, 1123 Ritter Road, reminded the City Commission of their ability to deny annexation. Jay McCallum, 101 S. Dixie Ave., shared his concerns about the annexation. Stephanie Stokes-Rankler, resident of Lake County, stated that she is a farmer. She spoke about water. Page 7 of 10 September 10, 2026, Regular Minutes Sarah McCallum, 2125 Miller Blvd and 101 S. Dixie, shared her comments about the annexation. She did not understand the reason for annexation at this time. Richard Wohlfarth, Developer, presented the concept plan for Kensington Gardens, which would be located on South Gray’s Airport Road. He stated that a traffic impact analysis had been done and submitted to Lake County, noting that there would be a traffic signal at South Gray’s Airport Road and Lake Geneva Drive in the future. He stated that his team had been working with Lake County and they have committed to pay a percentage of placement of a traffic signal based on the traffic analyses. Mayor Cheshire reiterated his previously stated position that the City should refrain from annexing additional property with Amendment 3 on the horizon. Vice Mayor DeGrave stated that if the Commission denied the annexation, it should consider a moratorium on future annexations until the City was closer to having additional wastewater treatment capacity available. Commissioner Raysin expressed concern regarding the additional traffic the development could generate and its potential impact on the rural character of the area. Vice Mayor DeGrave noted that denying the annexation would not necessarily prevent future development of the surrounding properties. He stated that development permitted under existing land-use designations could occur and potentially be less desirable, and that denying the annexation would not eliminate future traffic or population growth. Source
2026-09-10 Motion
Moved; the council to TABLE the following items G, First Reading of Ordinance 2026- 012, and H, First Reading of Ordinance 2026-013. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-09-10 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the first reading of Ordinance 2026- 017. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-08-27 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Mayor Cheshire called for a roll call vote and declared the motion carried unanimously, 5-0. 5. REGULAR AGENDA (a) Resolution 2026-042, First Amendment to an Interlocal Agreement with Lake County for Use of Library Impact Fees Ms. Geraci-Carver read Resolution 2026-042 by title. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF FRUITLAND PARK, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE CITY OF FRUITLAND PARK RELATING TO THE USE OF LIBRARY IMPACT FEES WHICH AWARDS THE CI TY AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $620,000.00 TO FUND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN/ENGINEERING SERVICES, CONSTRUCTION, EQUIPMENT AND FURNISHINGS FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE NORTH SIDE OF THE FRUITLAND PARK LIBRARY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Source
2026-08-27 Motion
Moved; the council to TABLE Resolution 2026-042 as presented. Source
2026-08-27 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution 2026-043 as presented. Robert Wille, 843 Berry Hill Circle, stated that he had been aware of the City’s sewer capacity concerns since relocating to Fruitland Park and that the need for additional sewer capacity had been evident for approximately ten years. He asked for an update on the City’s progress in addressing the issue and how many approved units would require sewer service. Vice Mayor DeGrave stated that developments approved by the City Commission do not always build out. He said a development may be approved and never be built. The City Commission does not necessarily know that at the time of approval. However, the City Commission does know they are promising to service a development. That is why the Master Development Agreements contain language about the limited sewage capacity and that such capacity will be granted on a first come, first serve basis. Mitchell Langley, 101 S Valley Road, spoke about development and capacity. Carl Yauk, 1123 Ritter Road, spoke about development and capacity. Sarah McCallum, 2125 Miller Blvd, spoke about development and capacity. She stated that during the last P&Z Magistrate meeting, it was noted that additional information would be available to the public at the City Commission meeting. Ms. Geraci-Carver spoke regarding Sarah McCallum’s comments . She said the subject item from the P&Z Magistrate meeting was not on the agenda for this meeting. Information would be provided in conjunction with that agenda item being presented to the City Commission. Kristen Nelson, 2928 Tangerine Court, Leesburg, stated that she represented CFC Florida. She discussed the City’s Book Page subscription. She also stated that she would like for the City of Fruitland Park to declare October 14 Charlie Kirk Day. Mayor Cheshire asked Ms. Manila to have staff gather the numbers related to development and capacity so that everyone would know the facts. Mr. Dicus addressed some of the concerns expressed. He noted that he has the data available to provide to those interested. Vice Mayor DeGrave clarified with Ms. Geraci -Carver, the language being included in MDA’s pertaining to capacity. Ms. Geraci -Carver stated there is language that the City may not have capacity until 2030. There is also language that final concurrency reviews are conducted at construction plan approval, thereby obligating the City to provide those services. Source
2026-08-27 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Resolution 2026- 048 as presented. Mayor Cheshire called for a roll call vote and declared the motion carried by a vote of 3- 2, Mayor Cheshire and Commissioner Raysin dissenting. 6. PUBLIC HEARING (a) First Reading of Ordinance 2026-014, Consideration of Request from Waste Management for the Implementation of a Fuel Surcharge Ms. Source
2026-08-04 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Resolution 2026-039, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-07-23 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented. Vote 4-0. Source
2026-07-09 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented. Vote 3-0. Source
2026-07-09 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution 2026- 032. Source
2026-07-09 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Resolution 2026- 033. Source
2026-07-09 Second
Seconded; the council to deny Resolution 2026- 034. Source
2026-07-09 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Resolution 2026-035, rejecting proposals. Source
2026-06-25 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented. Vote 4-0. Source
2026-06-11 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented. Vote 4-0. Source
2026-06-11 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the Second Reading of Ordinance 2026-010. Vote 4-0. Source
2026-06-11 Motion
Moved; the council to TABLE Ordinance Nos. 2025-014, 2025- 015, and 2025-016. Mayor Cheshire called for a vote and declared the motion carried unanimously, 4-0. (e) Second Reading of Ordinance 2025- 025, Annexation of Approximately 93.73± Acres of Property Generally Located North of CR 466A and West of Micro Racetrack Road, Vita Serena, Petitioner: Richard Wohlfarth on behalf of the owner, Joseph C. Burke, Jr., Trust. (city manager/city attorney/community development) AT FIRST READING, THIS ITEM WAS DENIED BY THE CITY COMMISSION ON 01/08/2026. Ms. Geraci-Carver read Ordinance 2025-025 by title only. Page 4 of 9 June 11, 2026, Regular Minutes AN ORDINANC E OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF FRUITLAND PARK, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF FRUITLAND PARK, FLORIDA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN SECTION 171.044, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS A PPROXIMATELY 93.73± ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF CR466A AND WEST OF MICRO RACETRACK ROAD; DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO PROVIDE CERTIFIED COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE AFTER APPROVAL TO THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, THE LAKE COUNTY MANAGER AND THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR SCRIVENER’S ERRORS; SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Ms. Geraci-Carver stated that the applicant had submitted an amended comprehensive plan amendment which previously was requesting multi-fa mily land use designation. They have changed that to single family medium density, less density than what is allowed in the com prehensive plan. Richard Wohlfarth, representing the property owner, stated there were three related agenda items for consideration and noted the development plan had previously been discussed at a February workshop. Source
2026-06-11 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the Second Reading of Ordinance 2025-025. During public comment, several residents raised concerns about annexation, infrastructure, and growth management. Carl Yauk, 1123 Ritter Road, questioned whether the City was legally required to approve the annexation, to which City Attorney Anita Geraci-Carver clarified that approval is not mandatory. He also raised concerns regarding traffic impacts, school overcrowding, and how growth decisions are made in Fruitland Park. Additional speakers focused on infrastructure and capacity concerns. Chuck Padgett, 1740 Myrtle Lake Avenue, criticized the parking design, arguing that the proposed spaces would Page 5 of 9 June 11, 2026, Regular Minutes not accommodate the number of vehicles anticipated, and urged developers to contribute more toward road improvements. Vote 3-1. Source
2026-06-11 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the Second Reading of Ordinance 2025-026. Vote 3-1. Source
2026-06-11 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the Second Reading of Ordinance 2025-027. Mayor Cheshire called for public comments. Sarah McCallum again voiced concerns regarding the annexation notices and the broader tax implications of the proposed development. She argued that converting a commercially zoned C-2 parcel to residential use was not in the City’s best interest, particularly given existing tax concerns. She stressed the importance of evaluating the City’s overall tax base and urged the Commission to reject the commercial zoning change. Carl Yauk reiterated his concern about who should guide growth in Fruitland Park, questioning whether decisions should be made by developers or by the residents and the City’s long-term interests. Responding to the concerns, Richard Wohlfarth, representing the applicant, clarified that the C-2 parcel in question is primarily frontage that will become right of way. He stated that while the project could result in an estimated 30% reduction in potential tax revenue, the Page 7 of 9 June 11, 2026, Regular Minutes development would still provide a net tax benefit to the City. Addressing infrastructure concerns, he explained that the existing water plant has adequate capacity, with the primary issue being system redundancy. He noted the new water plant would address that need for both current and future developments. Mr. Wohlfarth added that construction is anticipated to begin in January, with the subdivision taking approximately one year to complete, meaning the first residential units would likely not be available until 2028. He also responded to concerns regarding driveway and parking capacity, stating the design would provide adequate room for vehicles. Vice Mayor Patrick DeGrave asked about language in the Master Development Agreement (MDA) concerning infrastructure, specifically sewer capacity, and questioned how the development would proceed if the sewer plant is not yet operational. Mr. Wohlfarth explained that the MDA provides that capacity is not reserved or guaranteed until a developer or builder pays for it, meaning they do not secure ownership of that capacity in advance. Several residents spoke in opposition to continued development and annexation, emphasizing concerns about infrastructure, community character, and quality of life. Mitchell Langley stated that development is moving forward without infrastructure being prioritized and urged the City Commission to put residents’ interests first. Ken Hutchinson, 107 E Lavista Street, expressed frustration that while more development is being proposed, existing areas within Fruitland Park are being neglected and deteriorating. Chuck Padgett referenced previously approved developments near his home, describing them as an eyesore, and thanked Mayor Chris Cheshire for opposing the Vita Serena ordinances. Vincent Polite, 1908 Bell Creek Loop, spoke in favor of preserving Fruitland Park’s small- town character, urging the City to focus on resolving current issues rather than approving more growth. He later questioned how much outreach commissioners had done with constituents before placing the item on the agenda. Shayna Grunewald, 929 Hawk Landing, argued that residents’ preferences for larger lots are often ignored by developers and said the annexation itself is the central issue. Vote 3-1. Source
2026-06-08 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Resolution 2026-029. Vote 3-0. Source
2026-02-26 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented. Vote 4-0. Source
2026-02-26 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the first reading of Ordinance 2026-006, as presented. Vote 4-0. Source
2026-02-26 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the second reading of Ordinance 2026-001, as presented. Vote 4-0. Source
2026-02-26 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the second reading of Ordinance 2026-002, as presented. Vote 4-0. Source
2026-02-26 Motion
Moved; the council to TABLE thefirst readingofOrdinance2026-003. Vote 4-0. Source
2026-02-12 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the first reading of Ordinance 2026-005, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-02-12 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the Second Reading of Ordinance 2026-004, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-02-12 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the First Reading of Ordinance 2025-029, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-02-12 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the First Reading of Ordinance 2026-002, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-02-12 Motion
Moved; the council to TABLE the first reading of Ordinance 2026-003, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-01-22 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the minutes from January 8, 2026, as presented. Vote 3-0. Source
2026-01-22 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution 2026-005, as presented. Vote 3-0. Source
2026-01-22 Motion
Moved; the council to Approve Resolution 2026-006, as presented. Mayor Cheshire called for a vote on the motion and declared it carried unanimously. Source
2026-01-22 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution 2026-007, as presented. Vote 3-0. Source
2026-01-22 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Resolution 2026-008, as presented. Mayor Cheshire called for a roll call vote on the motion and declared it carried unanimously,3-0. (e) Resolution 2026-010, Micro Paving for Chelsea Run and Wingspread Subdivisions Ms. Source
2026-01-22 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution 2026-010, as presented. Vote 3-0. Source
2026-01-22 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the second reading of Ordinance 2025-023, as presented. Vote 3-0. Source
2026-01-22 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the Second Reading of Ordinance 2025-029, as presented. Vote 3-0. Source
2026-01-22 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the Second Reading of Ordinance 2025-030, as presented. Source
2026-01-08 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the Site Plan Modification Pertaining to Amenities for the Evolve at Grove Park Project. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-01-08 Motion
Moved; the council to Approve the Request for Release of Performance Bond by Halff, Inc. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-01-08 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Resolution 2026-002, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-01-08 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Resolution 2025-089, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-01-08 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution 2025-090, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-01-08 Motion
Moved; the council to TABLE the First Reading of Ordinance 2025-027, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-01-08 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the First Reading of Ordinance 2025-029, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-01-08 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the First Reading of Ordinance 2025-030, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2025-11-13 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution 2025-083, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2025-11-13 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution 2025-084, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2025-11-13 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the final reading of Ordinance 2025- 008, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2025-11-13 Motion
Moved; the council to Approve Resolution 2025-070, Readopt the Final Millage Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, and Recertify Compliance under s. Vote 5-0. Source
2025-11-13 Motion
Moved; the council to Approve Resolution 2025-071, to Recertify Compliance under s. Vote 5-0. Source
2025-11-13 Motion
Moved; the council to Approve the Final Reading of Ordinance 2025-009, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2025-11-13 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the Final reading of Ordinance 2025-010. Vote 5-0. Source
2025-10-23 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Vote 4-0. Source
2025-10-23 Motion
Moved; the council to TABLE Resolution 2025-083, until November 13, 2025. Vote 4-0. Source
2025-10-09 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2025-10-09 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution 2025-077, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2025-09-11 Motion
Moved; the council to adopt Resolution No. Vote 5-0. Source
2025-09-11 Second
Seconded; the council to TABLE Resolution No. Vote 5-0. Source
2025-09-11 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Ordinance 2025-021, on first reading, as previously cited. Vote 5-0. Source
2025-09-11 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the Resolution No 2025-050, as previously cited. Source
2025-09-11 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution No. Vote 5-0. Source
2025-07-24 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the Consent Agenda Items as presented. The motion carried unanimously by voice vote. Source
2025-07-24 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution 2025-054, as previously cited. Mayor Cheshire opened the public hearing. The public hearing was closed. July 24, 2025, City Commission Minutes - Page 3 of 7 Mayor Cheshire called for a roll call vote on the motion and declared it carried unanimously,5-0. Source
2025-07-10 Motion
Moved; the council to approve June 26, 2025, regular meeting minutes as presented. Source
2025-07-10 Motion
Moved; the council to adopt Resolution 2025-048 as previously cited. Mayor Cheshire opened the public hearing. No one indicated a desire to speak, and the public hearing was closed. Mayor Cheshire called for a roll call vote on the motion and declared it carried unanimously,3-0. (b) Resolution 2025-046, Approval of the Establishment of an Estimated Assessment Rate for Fire Services Assessment for the Fiscal Year Beginning October 1, 2025, relating to the Provision of Fire Services within The Village of Fruitland Park Benefit Area. Anita Geraci-Carver, City Attorney, read Resolution 2025-046, by title only. Source
2025-07-10 Motion
Moved; the council to adopt Resolution 2025-046 as previously cited. Vote 3-0. Source
2025-07-10 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Ordinance 2025-017, on first reading, as previously cited. Mayor Cheshire opened the public hearing. No one indicated a desire to speak, and the public hearing was closed. Mayor Cheshire called for a roll call vote on the motion and declared it carried unanimously,3-0. Source
2025-07-10 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Ordinance 2025-018, on first reading, as previously cited. Vote 3-0. Source
2025-07-10 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Ordinance 2025-008, on first reading, as previously cited. Mayor Cheshire opened the public hearing. Mitchell Langley, 101 South Valley Road, inquired about whether the Master Plan studies included the capacity anticipated in association with incoming development. Ms. Manila said all new developments that are in process had been factored into the Master Plan. Mayor Cheshire asked if the sewer for this would run from 466A. Robb Dicus, Public Works Director, stated that it would ultimately have to be engineered, but it would have to go down Cutoff Road or through the development. The public hearing was closed. Mayor Cheshire called for a roll call vote on the motion and declared it carried unanimously,3-0. 6. QUASI-JUDICIALPUBLICHEARING (a) First Reading of Ordinance 2025-009, Approval of a Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Pine Ridge Dairy Subdivision for 52.66± Acres Generally Located South of Pine Ridge Dairy Road and West of Brookstone Lane, Petitioner: Peterson & Myers, PA (Shelton Rice) on behalf of the owner, Pine Ridge Park L. Source
2025-07-10 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Ordinance 2025-009 on first reading, as previously cited. Vote 3-0. Source
2025-07-10 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Ordinance 2025-010 on first reading, as previously cited. Mayor Cheshire opened the public hearing July 10, 2025, City Commission Minutes -Page 7 of 10 Ms. Geraci-Carver noted that the revision concerning limited access to Pine Ridge Dairy Road was included in Section Ten of the MDA, and she read the revision. Vice Mayor DeGrave asked if the MDA obligated a western connection through the church property. Ms. Geraci-Carver said it mandated access to the north, which is church property. Mayor Cheshire wondered if after the traffic study is complete, the developer could request a change to allow for reopening the development to Pine Ridge Dairy Road. Vote 3-0. Source
2025-07-10 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution 2025-039. Vote 3-0. Source
2025-06-26 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Consent Agenda Items a and c, as presented. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 5. REGULARAGENDA (a) Resolution 2025-033, Approval of Agreement between the City of Fruitland Park and Infinity Fitness Inc. for Use of the City Swimming Pool. Moved from Consent Agenda Anita Geraci-Carver, City Attorney, read into the record proposed Resolution 2025- 033, the substance of which is as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF FRUITLAND PARK, FLORIDA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN INFINITY FITNESS INC. Source
2025-06-26 Second
Seconded; the council to adopt Resolution 2025-033 as previously cited. June 26, 2025, City Commission Minutes -Page 3 of 6 Mayor Cheshire called for a roll call vote on the motion and declared it carried unanimously. Mayor Cheshire announced that items b - e would need to be tabled. Ms. Geraci- Carver advised that all of the items could be tabled with a single motion. (b) Resolution 2025-040, Deferred Parking Agreement. Petitioner: Catalyst Design Group on behalf of the owner, Birch Enterprises LLC (Urick and Wilder). (city manager/city attorney/community development director) TABLED 06/12/25. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF FRUITLAND PARK, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE DEFERRED PARKING AGREEMENT CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 162.040(D), CITY OF FRUITLAND PARK LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BETWEEN THE CITY AND BIRCH ENTERPRISES, LLCFORTHEURICK AND WILDER APARTMENTPROJECT: AUTHORIZING EFFECTIVEDATE. (c) Resolution 2025-030, Proportionate Share Mitigation Agreement (School Concurrency - Urick and Wilder). (city manager/city attorney/community development director) TABLED 06/12/25. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF FRUITLAND PARK,FLORIDA,APPROVING THE PROPORTIONATE SHARE MITIGATION AGREEMENT FORTHE PROJECT URICK AND WILDERSTREET MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL CONCURRENCY CASE #2024-29; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT; AND PROVIDINGFOR ANEFFECTIVEDATE. (d) Resolution 2025-022, Major Site Plan for Approximately 10.42± Acres Generally Located South of Urick Street and East of Wilder Street. Petitioner: Catalyst Design Group on behalf of the owner, Birch Enterprises LLC. (city manager/city attorney/community development director) TABLED 06/12/25. Source
2025-06-26 Motion
Moved; the council to appoint Commissioner Cosenza as the MPO Governing Board member. Source
2025-06-26 Motion
Moved; the council to appoint Commissioner Williams as the MPO Governing Board Alternate member. Source
2025-06-12 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the consent agenda, as presented. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 5. REGULARAGENDA (a) Resolution 2025-031, Arbor Park Phase I Subdivision Final Plat for approximately 160.35± Acres Generally Located West of US Hwy 27/441, East of County Road 468, North of Griffin Road and South of Urick Street. Source
2025-06-12 Second
Seconded; the council to adopt Resolution 2025-031 as previously cited. Mayor Cheshire called for a roll call vote on the motion and declared it carried unanimously. (b) Resolution 2025-028, Variance Requested by Contractor Tool Supply for Approximately 4.83± Acres Generally Located East of US Hwy 27/441 and North of South Grays Airport Road. Source
2025-06-12 Motion
Moved; the council to adopt Resolution 2025-028 as previously cited. Mayor Cheshire called for a roll call vote on the motion and declared it carried unanimously. June12,2025,CityCommissionMinutes-Page3of9 (c) Resolution 2025-029, Major Site Plan Requested by Contractor Tool Supply for Approximately 4. Source
2025-06-12 Second
Seconded; the council to adopt Resolution 2025-029 as previously cited. Mayor Cheshire called for a roll call vote on the motion and declared it carried unanimously. (d) Resolution 2025-040, Deferred Parking Agreement. Petitioner: Catalyst Design Group on behalf of the owner, Birch Enterprises LLC (Urick and Wilder). (city manager/city attorney/community development director) Acting City Attorney Sandy Minkoff read into the record the title of proposed Resolution 2025-040, the substance of which is as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF FRUITLAND PARK, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE DEFERRED PARKING AGREEMENT CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 162.040(D), CITY OF FRUITLAND PARK LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BETWEEN THE CITY AND BIRCH ENTERPRISES, LLCFOR THE URICK AND WILDER APARTMENT PROJECT; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVEDATE. Mr. Rankin provided information regarding the request for a deferred parking agreement. Jake Pretzell, Civil Engineer, Catalyst Design Group, explained that the deferred parking agreement would enable the preservation of trees on the property. He noted that a study June 12, 2025, City Commission Minutes -Page 4 of9 had been submitted to staff which indicated the number of parking spaces actually necessary for this type of project. Vice Mayor DeGrave stated that Exhibit C, did not depict where trees were being preserved. Source
2025-06-12 Motion
Moved; the council to adopt Resolution 2025-037, appointment of Martina Williams to the City Commission, District 2, as previously cited. Source
2025-05-22 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the consent agenda, as presented. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 4. REGULARAGENDA There were no regular agenda items. 5. PUBLIC HEARING (a) FinalReading ofOrdinance No.2025-011, Annexation,CR 468 Subdivision for Approximately 32.03± Acres Generally Located West of CR 468 and South of Myrtle Lake Ave. Source
2025-05-08 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Ordinance 2024-010, on final reading and as previously cited. Mayor Cheshire called for interested parties to be heard. There being none, the public hearing was closed. May8, 2025CityCommissionMinutes-Page2of 6 Mayor Cheshire called for a roll call vote on the motion and declared it carried unanimously. (c) First Reading of Ordinance No. 2025-011, Annexation, CR 468 Subdivision for Approximately 32.03± Acres GenerallyLocated West ofCR 468and South of Myrtle Lake Ave., Petitioner: Burgland Capital, LLC on behalf of the owner, William Kent Stokes Trust Ms. Geraci-Carver read into the record the title of proposed Ordinance 2025-01l, the substance of which is as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF FRUITLAND PARK FLORIDA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN SECTION 171.044, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS APPROXIMATELY32.03± ACRES OFLANDGENERALLYLOCATEDWEST OF CR468 AND SOUTHOF MYRTLELAKE AVE.; DIRECTINGTHE CITY MANAGER THE CLERK OF THECIRCUITCOURT, THELAKECOUNTY MANAGERAND THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR SCRIVENER'S ERRORS AND SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVEDATE. Mr. Rankin described the proposed project and stated that the Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval with the condition that all lots be 5o' in size. Vice Mayor DeGrave expressed concern about proposed lot sizes. He also noted that the site appeared heavily wooded. He asked if construction would require clear cutting the corner. Luke Classon, an Engineer with Appian Engineering, stated the only trees around the edge of the development that would be preserved were the Oak Trees. Source
2025-05-08 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Ordinance 2025-011, on first reading and as previously cited. May 8, 2025City Commission Minutes-Page 3of 6 Mayor Cheshire called for interested parties to be heard. There being none, the public hearing was closed. Mayor Cheshire called for a roll call vote on the motion and declared it carried unanimously. (d) First Reading and Public Hearing of Ordinance 2025-012, Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment - CR 468 Subdivision for Approximately 32.03± Acres Generally Located West of CR 468 and South of Myrtle Lake Ave., Petitioner: Burgland Capital, LLC, on behalf of the owner, William Kent Stokes Trust. Ms. Geraci-Carver read into the record the title of proposed Ordinance 2025-012, the substance of which is as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF FRUITLAND AMENDMENT BY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION FROM LAKE COUNTY URBAN MEDIUM DENSITY TO CITY MULTI-FAMILY HIGHDENSITYOF32. Source
2025-05-08 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Ordinance 2025-012, with the condition designating the City of Fruitland Park Land Use Density that does not allow more than 4 units per acre, on first reading and as previously cited. Mayor Cheshire called for interested parties to be heard. There being none, the public hearing was closed. Mayor Cheshire called for a roll call vote on the motion and declared it carried unanimously. May 8, 2025 City Commission Minutes -Page 4 of 6 6. QUASI-JUDICIAL PUBLIC HEARING (a) First Reading and Public Hearing of Ordinance 2025-013, Rezoning to PUD- CR 468 Subdivision for Approximately 32.03± Acres Generally Located West of CR 468 and South of Myrtle Lake Ave., Petitioner: Burgland Capital, LLC, on behalf of the owner,WilliamKent Stokes Trust. Ms. Geraci-Carver read into the record the title of proposed Ordinance 2025-013, the substance of which is as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF FRUITLAND PARK,FLORIDA,REZONING APPROXIMATELY 32.03± ACRES OF PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF CR 468 AND SOUTHOF LAKE MYRTLE AVE.; FRUITLAND PARK, FLORIDA FROM LAKE COUNTY AGRICULTURE AND RESIDENTIAL PROFESSIONAL ZONING TO THE CITY OF FRUITLAND PARK DESIGNATION OF PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF FRUITLAND PARK; APPROVING A MASTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE PROPERTY;DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF FRUITLAND PARK;PROVIDING ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR SCRIVENER'S ERRORS; ANDPROVIDINGFOR ANEFFECTIVEDATE. Source

Dated public-record events, each with its source. Opinions and private life are out of scope.