Today is Election Day in Lake County. Polls are open 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Find your precinct at lakevotes.gov.

DocketHeron

your local government, delivered weekly.

Martina Williams

Fruitland Park City Commission: Commissioner, District 2

Seat as listed on the city's council page, read 2026-11-03.

Record

Meetings attended 20 of 22Arrived late 0Motions made 19Motions seconded 57Split votes 4Recorded no votes 0

Counted from the Fruitland Park City Commission minutes posted by the city, 2025-06-26 to 2026-10-08. Minutes post weeks after each meeting; the most recent meetings are not yet included.

Split votes and attendance (6)

2026-10-08 Vote
Split vote 4-1; the council to DENY the final reading of Ordinance 2026-011. Mayor Cheshire called for public comments. James P. Logan, owner of property adjacent to the proposed annexation, expressed support for the project. He stated that, as a nearby resident, he would be directly impacted by the development and expressed confidence in the developer. He requested that the City Commission reconsider its decision to deny the annexation. Richard Wohlfarth, Developer, provided a presentation outlining the proposed annexation, noting that one parcel is a complete enclave and another is a partial enclave. He clarified that the Commission's consideration was limited to annexation of the parcel entirely surrounded by City limits. He discussed his collaboration with Mr. Logan and the City in securing property for a future water treatment plant and addressed existing water consumption and capacity. He indicated that land use and zoning matters would be presented for consideration at a future meeting. Mr. Wohlfarth noted that his team would be willing to meet with Lake County to support signalization at South Grays Airport Road and US 441. He requested reconsideration to table the item to the December meeting. Page3of8 October 8, 2026, Regular Minutes Mayor Cheshire expressed surprise that the annexation was placed on the agenda prior to the November 3 election, given the Commission's previously expressed concerns regarding Amendment 3. Commissioner Raysin expressed concern about the traffic issues that would be created by the proposed development. Mr. Wohlfarth commented that if the item were tabled, he would return to the commission with a proposed solution for the flow traffic. He acknowledged the issue with trying to get out onto US 441 from S Grays Airport Road. Mr. Raysin asked if there was any alternate access points. Mr. Wohlfarth said there may be an opportunity to use Register Road, and the developer would be amenable to making that connection immediately. Carl Yauk, 1123 Ritter Road, expressed opposition to the annexation and objected to tabling the ordinance. Mitchell Langley, 101 S. Valley Road, opposed the annexation, discussed ordinance adoption procedures, and referenced a recent annexation lawsuit involving the Town of Lady Lake. Mayor Cheshire asked City Attorney Geraci-Carver to explain the ordinance adoption process under Florida Statutes. Ms. Geraci-Carver stated that she was unaware of any statutory requirements inconsistent with the City's established procedures. Source
2026-07-23 Attendance
Recorded absent from the City Commission meeting (regular). Source
2026-06-11 Vote
Split vote 3-1; the council to approve the Second Reading of Ordinance 2025-025. During public comment, several residents raised concerns about annexation, infrastructure, and growth management. Carl Yauk, 1123 Ritter Road, questioned whether the City was legally required to approve the annexation, to which City Attorney Anita Geraci-Carver clarified that approval is not mandatory. He also raised concerns regarding traffic impacts, school overcrowding, and how growth decisions are made in Fruitland Park. Additional speakers focused on infrastructure and capacity concerns. Chuck Padgett, 1740 Myrtle Lake Avenue, criticized the parking design, arguing that the proposed spaces would Page 5 of 9 June 11, 2026, Regular Minutes not accommodate the number of vehicles anticipated, and urged developers to contribute more toward road improvements. Source
2026-06-11 Vote
Split vote 3-1; the council to approve the Second Reading of Ordinance 2025-026. Source
2026-06-11 Vote
Split vote 3-1; the council to approve the Second Reading of Ordinance 2025-027. Mayor Cheshire called for public comments. Sarah McCallum again voiced concerns regarding the annexation notices and the broader tax implications of the proposed development. She argued that converting a commercially zoned C-2 parcel to residential use was not in the City’s best interest, particularly given existing tax concerns. She stressed the importance of evaluating the City’s overall tax base and urged the Commission to reject the commercial zoning change. Carl Yauk reiterated his concern about who should guide growth in Fruitland Park, questioning whether decisions should be made by developers or by the residents and the City’s long-term interests. Responding to the concerns, Richard Wohlfarth, representing the applicant, clarified that the C-2 parcel in question is primarily frontage that will become right of way. He stated that while the project could result in an estimated 30% reduction in potential tax revenue, the Page 7 of 9 June 11, 2026, Regular Minutes development would still provide a net tax benefit to the City. Addressing infrastructure concerns, he explained that the existing water plant has adequate capacity, with the primary issue being system redundancy. He noted the new water plant would address that need for both current and future developments. Mr. Wohlfarth added that construction is anticipated to begin in January, with the subdivision taking approximately one year to complete, meaning the first residential units would likely not be available until 2028. He also responded to concerns regarding driveway and parking capacity, stating the design would provide adequate room for vehicles. Vice Mayor Patrick DeGrave asked about language in the Master Development Agreement (MDA) concerning infrastructure, specifically sewer capacity, and questioned how the development would proceed if the sewer plant is not yet operational. Mr. Wohlfarth explained that the MDA provides that capacity is not reserved or guaranteed until a developer or builder pays for it, meaning they do not secure ownership of that capacity in advance. Several residents spoke in opposition to continued development and annexation, emphasizing concerns about infrastructure, community character, and quality of life. Mitchell Langley stated that development is moving forward without infrastructure being prioritized and urged the City Commission to put residents’ interests first. Ken Hutchinson, 107 E Lavista Street, expressed frustration that while more development is being proposed, existing areas within Fruitland Park are being neglected and deteriorating. Chuck Padgett referenced previously approved developments near his home, describing them as an eyesore, and thanked Mayor Chris Cheshire for opposing the Vita Serena ordinances. Vincent Polite, 1908 Bell Creek Loop, spoke in favor of preserving Fruitland Park’s small- town character, urging the City to focus on resolving current issues rather than approving more growth. He later questioned how much outreach commissioners had done with constituents before placing the item on the agenda. Shayna Grunewald, 929 Hawk Landing, argued that residents’ preferences for larger lots are often ignored by developers and said the annexation itself is the central issue. Source
2025-08-05 Attendance
Recorded absent from the City Commission meeting (regular). Source

All motions made and seconded (76)

2026-10-08 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-10-08 Second
Seconded; the council to DENY the final reading of Ordinance 2026-011. Mayor Cheshire called for public comments. James P. Logan, owner of property adjacent to the proposed annexation, expressed support for the project. He stated that, as a nearby resident, he would be directly impacted by the development and expressed confidence in the developer. He requested that the City Commission reconsider its decision to deny the annexation. Richard Wohlfarth, Developer, provided a presentation outlining the proposed annexation, noting that one parcel is a complete enclave and another is a partial enclave. He clarified that the Commission's consideration was limited to annexation of the parcel entirely surrounded by City limits. He discussed his collaboration with Mr. Logan and the City in securing property for a future water treatment plant and addressed existing water consumption and capacity. He indicated that land use and zoning matters would be presented for consideration at a future meeting. Mr. Wohlfarth noted that his team would be willing to meet with Lake County to support signalization at South Grays Airport Road and US 441. He requested reconsideration to table the item to the December meeting. Page3of8 October 8, 2026, Regular Minutes Mayor Cheshire expressed surprise that the annexation was placed on the agenda prior to the November 3 election, given the Commission's previously expressed concerns regarding Amendment 3. Commissioner Raysin expressed concern about the traffic issues that would be created by the proposed development. Mr. Wohlfarth commented that if the item were tabled, he would return to the commission with a proposed solution for the flow traffic. He acknowledged the issue with trying to get out onto US 441 from S Grays Airport Road. Mr. Raysin asked if there was any alternate access points. Mr. Wohlfarth said there may be an opportunity to use Register Road, and the developer would be amenable to making that connection immediately. Carl Yauk, 1123 Ritter Road, expressed opposition to the annexation and objected to tabling the ordinance. Mitchell Langley, 101 S. Valley Road, opposed the annexation, discussed ordinance adoption procedures, and referenced a recent annexation lawsuit involving the Town of Lady Lake. Mayor Cheshire asked City Attorney Geraci-Carver to explain the ordinance adoption process under Florida Statutes. Ms. Geraci-Carver stated that she was unaware of any statutory requirements inconsistent with the City's established procedures. Vote 4-1. Source
2026-10-08 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the final reading of Ordinance 2026-015, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-09-10 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-09-10 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution 2026-046, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-09-10 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Resolution 2026- 046, with an amendment eliminating the street sweeper from the budget and reallocating those funds ($175,000) to the wastewater treatment plant. Mitchell Langley, 101 S. Valley Road, asked if there were alternative budget considerations that would not reduce services currently offered to residents. He said the pool provides family-oriented activity for residents. Page 4 of 10 September 10, 2026, Regular Minutes Mayor Cheshire shared statistics from the pool use over the past year. Ms. Manila stated that she would work with Ms. Fields with regard to pool operations. Carl Yauk, 1123 Ritter Road, discussed the library expansion and brought up the suggestion of extended Library hours. Ms. Manila responded to Mr. Yauk’s comments regarding the library expansion funds. Mayor Cheshire stated it would be nice to have the library open later in the evenings and on Saturdays for children but acknowledged that such operation would mean more expense. He noted it was tried approximately ten years ago, and it was stopped after the trial period. Commissioner Williams asked what the cost would be to operate the library for a day. Ms. Manila stated she could bring that cost back to the commission. Jay McCallum, 101 S. Dixie Avenue, expressed appreciation for the prioritization of wastewater improvements and raised concerns regarding accumulated sand, dirt, and vegetation along Dixie Avenue. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-09-10 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Ordinance 2026-015, on first reading. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-09-10 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Ordinance 2026-015, on first reading. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-09-10 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the first reading of Ordinance 2026- 017. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-08-27 Second
Seconded; the council to TABLE Resolution 2026-042 as presented. Source
2026-08-27 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Resolution 2026-043 as presented. Robert Wille, 843 Berry Hill Circle, stated that he had been aware of the City’s sewer capacity concerns since relocating to Fruitland Park and that the need for additional sewer capacity had been evident for approximately ten years. He asked for an update on the City’s progress in addressing the issue and how many approved units would require sewer service. Vice Mayor DeGrave stated that developments approved by the City Commission do not always build out. He said a development may be approved and never be built. The City Commission does not necessarily know that at the time of approval. However, the City Commission does know they are promising to service a development. That is why the Master Development Agreements contain language about the limited sewage capacity and that such capacity will be granted on a first come, first serve basis. Mitchell Langley, 101 S Valley Road, spoke about development and capacity. Carl Yauk, 1123 Ritter Road, spoke about development and capacity. Sarah McCallum, 2125 Miller Blvd, spoke about development and capacity. She stated that during the last P&Z Magistrate meeting, it was noted that additional information would be available to the public at the City Commission meeting. Ms. Geraci-Carver spoke regarding Sarah McCallum’s comments . She said the subject item from the P&Z Magistrate meeting was not on the agenda for this meeting. Information would be provided in conjunction with that agenda item being presented to the City Commission. Kristen Nelson, 2928 Tangerine Court, Leesburg, stated that she represented CFC Florida. She discussed the City’s Book Page subscription. She also stated that she would like for the City of Fruitland Park to declare October 14 Charlie Kirk Day. Mayor Cheshire asked Ms. Manila to have staff gather the numbers related to development and capacity so that everyone would know the facts. Mr. Dicus addressed some of the concerns expressed. He noted that he has the data available to provide to those interested. Vice Mayor DeGrave clarified with Ms. Geraci -Carver, the language being included in MDA’s pertaining to capacity. Ms. Geraci -Carver stated there is language that the City may not have capacity until 2030. There is also language that final concurrency reviews are conducted at construction plan approval, thereby obligating the City to provide those services. Source
2026-08-04 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution 2026-039, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-06-25 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented. Vote 4-0. Source
2026-06-25 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution 2026-030. Source
2026-06-11 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented. Vote 4-0. Source
2026-06-11 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution 2026-027. Mayor Cheshire called for a roll call vote and declared the motion carried unanimously, 4-0. (b) Discussion and Direction re: Appointment of Someone to Serve as District 3 Commissioner through November 3, 2026 Election Attorney Geraci-Carver stated that someone could be appointed at any time to fill the vacancy. She noted that the Charter does require that someone be appointed. Mayor Cheshire thought it would be better to have someone appointed who is not a candidate for the district 3 seat. The City Commission agreed that door hangers would be appropriate to encourage interest in finding someone to appointment to the District 3 seat, serving on City Commission through the November 3, 2026, general election. Source
2026-06-11 Second
Seconded; the council to TABLE Ordinance Nos. 2025-014, 2025- 015, and 2025-016. Mayor Cheshire called for a vote and declared the motion carried unanimously, 4-0. (e) Second Reading of Ordinance 2025- 025, Annexation of Approximately 93.73± Acres of Property Generally Located North of CR 466A and West of Micro Racetrack Road, Vita Serena, Petitioner: Richard Wohlfarth on behalf of the owner, Joseph C. Burke, Jr., Trust. (city manager/city attorney/community development) AT FIRST READING, THIS ITEM WAS DENIED BY THE CITY COMMISSION ON 01/08/2026. Ms. Geraci-Carver read Ordinance 2025-025 by title only. Page 4 of 9 June 11, 2026, Regular Minutes AN ORDINANC E OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF FRUITLAND PARK, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF FRUITLAND PARK, FLORIDA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN SECTION 171.044, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS A PPROXIMATELY 93.73± ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF CR466A AND WEST OF MICRO RACETRACK ROAD; DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO PROVIDE CERTIFIED COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE AFTER APPROVAL TO THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, THE LAKE COUNTY MANAGER AND THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR SCRIVENER’S ERRORS; SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Ms. Geraci-Carver stated that the applicant had submitted an amended comprehensive plan amendment which previously was requesting multi-fa mily land use designation. They have changed that to single family medium density, less density than what is allowed in the com prehensive plan. Richard Wohlfarth, representing the property owner, stated there were three related agenda items for consideration and noted the development plan had previously been discussed at a February workshop. Source
2026-06-11 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the Second Reading of Ordinance 2025-025. During public comment, several residents raised concerns about annexation, infrastructure, and growth management. Carl Yauk, 1123 Ritter Road, questioned whether the City was legally required to approve the annexation, to which City Attorney Anita Geraci-Carver clarified that approval is not mandatory. He also raised concerns regarding traffic impacts, school overcrowding, and how growth decisions are made in Fruitland Park. Additional speakers focused on infrastructure and capacity concerns. Chuck Padgett, 1740 Myrtle Lake Avenue, criticized the parking design, arguing that the proposed spaces would Page 5 of 9 June 11, 2026, Regular Minutes not accommodate the number of vehicles anticipated, and urged developers to contribute more toward road improvements. Vote 3-1. Source
2026-06-11 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the Second Reading of Ordinance 2025-026. Vote 3-1. Source
2026-06-11 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the Second Reading of Ordinance 2025-027. Mayor Cheshire called for public comments. Sarah McCallum again voiced concerns regarding the annexation notices and the broader tax implications of the proposed development. She argued that converting a commercially zoned C-2 parcel to residential use was not in the City’s best interest, particularly given existing tax concerns. She stressed the importance of evaluating the City’s overall tax base and urged the Commission to reject the commercial zoning change. Carl Yauk reiterated his concern about who should guide growth in Fruitland Park, questioning whether decisions should be made by developers or by the residents and the City’s long-term interests. Responding to the concerns, Richard Wohlfarth, representing the applicant, clarified that the C-2 parcel in question is primarily frontage that will become right of way. He stated that while the project could result in an estimated 30% reduction in potential tax revenue, the Page 7 of 9 June 11, 2026, Regular Minutes development would still provide a net tax benefit to the City. Addressing infrastructure concerns, he explained that the existing water plant has adequate capacity, with the primary issue being system redundancy. He noted the new water plant would address that need for both current and future developments. Mr. Wohlfarth added that construction is anticipated to begin in January, with the subdivision taking approximately one year to complete, meaning the first residential units would likely not be available until 2028. He also responded to concerns regarding driveway and parking capacity, stating the design would provide adequate room for vehicles. Vice Mayor Patrick DeGrave asked about language in the Master Development Agreement (MDA) concerning infrastructure, specifically sewer capacity, and questioned how the development would proceed if the sewer plant is not yet operational. Mr. Wohlfarth explained that the MDA provides that capacity is not reserved or guaranteed until a developer or builder pays for it, meaning they do not secure ownership of that capacity in advance. Several residents spoke in opposition to continued development and annexation, emphasizing concerns about infrastructure, community character, and quality of life. Mitchell Langley stated that development is moving forward without infrastructure being prioritized and urged the City Commission to put residents’ interests first. Ken Hutchinson, 107 E Lavista Street, expressed frustration that while more development is being proposed, existing areas within Fruitland Park are being neglected and deteriorating. Chuck Padgett referenced previously approved developments near his home, describing them as an eyesore, and thanked Mayor Chris Cheshire for opposing the Vita Serena ordinances. Vincent Polite, 1908 Bell Creek Loop, spoke in favor of preserving Fruitland Park’s small- town character, urging the City to focus on resolving current issues rather than approving more growth. He later questioned how much outreach commissioners had done with constituents before placing the item on the agenda. Shayna Grunewald, 929 Hawk Landing, argued that residents’ preferences for larger lots are often ignored by developers and said the annexation itself is the central issue. Vote 3-1. Source
2026-03-12 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented. Vote 3-0. Source
2026-03-12 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented. Source
2026-03-12 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the second and final reading of Ordinance 2026-006, as presented. Vote 3-0. Source
2026-03-04 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the second reading of Ordinance 2026-005. Vote 4-0. Source
2026-02-26 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented. Vote 4-0. Source
2026-02-26 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented. Vote 4-0. Source
2026-02-26 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented. Vote 4-0. Source
2026-02-26 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented. Vote 4-0. Source
2026-02-26 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the first reading of Ordinance 2026-006, as presented. Vote 4-0. Source
2026-02-26 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the second reading of Ordinance 2026-001, as presented. Vote 4-0. Source
2026-02-26 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the second reading of Ordinance 2026-002, as presented. Vote 4-0. Source
2026-02-12 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-02-12 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution 2026-009, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-02-12 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution 2026-004, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-02-12 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the Second Reading of Ordinance 2026-004, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-02-12 Second
Seconded; the council to TABLE the first reading of Ordinance 2026-003, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-01-22 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the minutes from January 8, 2026, as presented. Vote 3-0. Source
2026-01-22 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Resolution 2026-005, as presented. Vote 3-0. Source
2026-01-22 Second
Seconded; the council to Approve Resolution 2026-006, as presented. Mayor Cheshire called for a vote on the motion and declared it carried unanimously. Source
2026-01-22 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Resolution 2026-007, as presented. Vote 3-0. Source
2026-01-22 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution 2026-008, as presented. Mayor Cheshire called for a roll call vote on the motion and declared it carried unanimously,3-0. (e) Resolution 2026-010, Micro Paving for Chelsea Run and Wingspread Subdivisions Ms. Source
2026-01-22 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Resolution 2026-010, as presented. Vote 3-0. Source
2026-01-22 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the second reading of Ordinance 2025-023, as presented. Vote 3-0. Source
2026-01-22 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the Second Reading of Ordinance 2025-029, as presented. Vote 3-0. Source
2026-01-22 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the Second Reading of Ordinance 2025-030, as presented. Source
2026-01-08 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution 2026-003, to include an allowance for the City Manager to make necessary changes based on the review and comments. Vote 5-0. Source
2026-01-08 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the first reading of Ordinance 2025-023, as presented. Mayor Cheshire called for a roll call vote on the motion and declared it carried unanimously,5-0. (b) First Reading of Ordinance 2025-025, Annexation of Approximately 93.74± Acres Generally Located North of CR 466A and West of Micro Racetrack Road, Vita Serena, for Applicant Richard Wohlfarth on behalf of Joseph C. Burke, Jr., Owner. Ms. Geraci-Carver read Ordinance 2025-025, by title only. PARK， FLORIDA, AMENDING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF SET FORTHIN SECTION 171.044, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO INCLUDE WITHIN THECITYLIMITSAPPROXIMATELY93.74±ACRESOFLANDGENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF CR 466A AND WEST OF MICRO RACETRACK ROAD; DIRECTINGTHECITYMANAGERTOPROVIDECERTIFIEDCOPIESOFTHIS ORDINANCE AFTER APPROVAL TO THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, THELAKECOUNTYMANAGERANDTHEDEPARTMENTOFSTATEOFTHE STATE OF FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;PROVIDING FOR SCRIVENER'S ERRORS; SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Logan Opsahl, Attorney with the Lowndes firm, 215 N Eola Drive, presented the Vita Serena project, which consists of 93± acres on the Lake and Sumter County line. He stated that the plan had been revised since the Planning and Zoning Board meeting. He noted some of the comments and concerns were addressed in the revised site plan. He stated this particular project has been referred to as a multi-generational project and discussed the compatibility of the development while noting that the property is against the county line, which provides some unique circumstances. Mr. Opsahl discussed the two proposed access points and the significant infrastructure and in-road networks in the area. An Aerial photograph was provided to illustrate where the AdventHealth Page 9 of 16 January 8, 2026, RegularMinutes hospital would be developed, an existing shopping center and part of The Villages development. The site is currently a pasture, high and dry, without a lot of trees other than along the property lines. He introduced the project team, available to answer any questions. Mr. Opsahl said the number of units had been reduced from 410 to 344 in the revised plan. The lots that were 35' x 120' had been eliminated. He discussed connectivity of the development to Micro Racetrack Road with an upgraded entrance and addition of a roundabout. He stated the community would have ample amenities and discussed the community vision, explaining real world considerations for a project like this. Vice Mayor DeGrave asked if developer had secured property for the roundabout and Mr. Opsahl said the developer would provide all right of way for the roundabout. Vice Mayor DeGrave asked about the stormwater retention ponds to the far west, noting they were underneath the power lines. Mr. Opsahl responded the retention ponds would be dry and they would not be located under power lines or on any power company rights- of-way. Andon Calhoun, Oviedo, Florida, said the stormwater ponds would be located to the west of the transmission ponds and would be dry. Vice Mayor DeGrave asked about communications with Lake County, and Mr. Calhoun said there had been and would be ongoing communication with Lake County. A traffic signal would be installed at 466A, and the developers will share costs with Lake County for the signalization device and road improvements. He noted there is a tri-party agreement that includes Advent Health, Lake County and the developer. Vice Mayor DeGrave asked if provisions had been made to allow for four lanes in the roundabout, if needed. Mr. Wohlfarth said yes, the roundabout is flexible and a fourth lane to the east could be added once deemed necessary. Vice Mayor DeGrave did not support 4o' lots, and he noted the City's Land Development Regulations are being modified to allow 5o' lots. Commissioner Williams asked how the school district would accommodate additional students. Mr. Opsahl said a full concurrency review had been done with Lake County Schools, and a mitigation agreement is in place to allow for a grant and school impact fees to go toward construction of a new school as needed. The county has approved that agreement. Mayor Cheshire asked for an explanation of the traffic along CR466A and Micro Racetrack Road, and whether Lake County had approved the roundabout. Mr. Opsahl responded that design was part of ongoing conversations with the county. Mr. Wohlfarth added the traffic impact analysis has been completed, and the roundabout design came from the County to the developer. Traffic study currently shows level of service “D" on Micro Racetrack Road, but it is currently operating at a “C" level in the segment up to Lake Ella. The original request was 8 units per acre. Currently, the property is zoned agricultural and commercial. Mayor Cheshire expressed concern with the traffic. Page 10 of 16 January 8, 2026, Regular Minutes Public Comments Jeffrey Ahern, 278 Alberia Street, shared his concerns about the proposed project. Catherine Stanford, 35824 Micro Racetrack Road, property owner on Emery Lane, a crossroad to Micro Racetrack Road, stated her opposition to the proposed project and discussed her concerns. Maurice Allen, raised on Micro Racetrack Road, asked about the roundabout and expressed concern about traffic issues. Annie White, 356119 Racetrack Road, shared current real estate data from a local newspaper. Bart Ritota, 2619 Dartford Terrace, and adjacent to proposed plan, spoke about the global housing crisis and expressed his concerns about the proposed project. Peter Nolan, 257 Ellington Run, discussed his concerns about the proposed project. Sue Nolan, 257 Ellington Run, discussed her concerns about schools, as related to the proposed project. She also expressed concerns about power lines in the area. Mitchell Langley, 101 S Valley Road, spoke in support of the proposed project. Dan Knaul, 2577 Dartford Terrace, expressed concerns about the proposed project. He felt the dry ponds would be ugly. Debra Fromhart, 268 Rhapsody Path, expressed concerns about the proposed project and whether gopher turtles would be properly relocated. Vice Mayor DeGrave asked Mr. Opsahl if the developer had considered larger-sized lots. Mr. Opsahl said the number of 5o' lots had been increased. Vice Mayor DeGrave asked if everything that isn't a 50' lot could be eliminated and Mr. Opsahl said that would not be a viable option. Mr. Opsahl responded to questions and comments made by public. Source
2026-01-08 Second
Seconded; the council to TABLE the First Reading of Ordinance 2025-027, as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2025-12-11 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the minutes from November 13, 2025, as presented. Vote 4-0. Source
2025-12-11 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the 2026 Commissioner Meeting Schedule as presented. Vote 4-0. Source
2025-12-11 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution 2025-085, as presented. Vote 4-0. Source
2025-12-11 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution 2025-086, as presented. Vote 4-0. Source
2025-12-11 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution 2025-087, as presented. Vote 4-0. Source
2025-12-11 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Resolution 2025-088, as presented. Vote 4-0. Source
2025-12-11 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Resolution 2025-092, as presented. Vote 4-0. Source
2025-11-13 Motion
Moved; the council to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Vote 5-0. Source
2025-10-23 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution 2025-080, as presented. Vote 4-0. Source
2025-10-23 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution 2025-081, as presented. Vote 4-0. Source
2025-09-11 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution No. Vote 5-0. Source
2025-08-28 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution 2025-030, as previously cited. Vote 4-0. Source
2025-08-28 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution 2025-041, as previously cited. Vote 4-0. Source
2025-08-28 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Resolution No. Vote 4-0. Source
2025-08-28 Second
Seconded; the council to approve the First Reading of Ordinance No. Vote 4-0. Source
2025-07-24 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Ordinance 2025-017, on second and final reading, as previously cited. Vote 5-0. Source
2025-07-24 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Resolution 2025-034, as previously cited. Vote 5-0. Source
2025-07-10 Second
Seconded; the council to approve June 26, 2025, regular meeting minutes as presented. Source
2025-07-10 Second
Seconded; the council to adopt Resolution 2025-048 as previously cited. Mayor Cheshire opened the public hearing. No one indicated a desire to speak, and the public hearing was closed. Mayor Cheshire called for a roll call vote on the motion and declared it carried unanimously,3-0. (b) Resolution 2025-046, Approval of the Establishment of an Estimated Assessment Rate for Fire Services Assessment for the Fiscal Year Beginning October 1, 2025, relating to the Provision of Fire Services within The Village of Fruitland Park Benefit Area. Anita Geraci-Carver, City Attorney, read Resolution 2025-046, by title only. Source
2025-07-10 Second
Seconded; the council to adopt Resolution 2025-046 as previously cited. Vote 3-0. Source
2025-07-10 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Ordinance 2025-017, on first reading, as previously cited. Mayor Cheshire opened the public hearing. No one indicated a desire to speak, and the public hearing was closed. Mayor Cheshire called for a roll call vote on the motion and declared it carried unanimously,3-0. Source
2025-07-10 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Ordinance 2025-018, on first reading, as previously cited. Vote 3-0. Source
2025-07-10 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Ordinance 2025-008, on first reading, as previously cited. Mayor Cheshire opened the public hearing. Mitchell Langley, 101 South Valley Road, inquired about whether the Master Plan studies included the capacity anticipated in association with incoming development. Ms. Manila said all new developments that are in process had been factored into the Master Plan. Mayor Cheshire asked if the sewer for this would run from 466A. Robb Dicus, Public Works Director, stated that it would ultimately have to be engineered, but it would have to go down Cutoff Road or through the development. The public hearing was closed. Mayor Cheshire called for a roll call vote on the motion and declared it carried unanimously,3-0. 6. QUASI-JUDICIALPUBLICHEARING (a) First Reading of Ordinance 2025-009, Approval of a Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Pine Ridge Dairy Subdivision for 52.66± Acres Generally Located South of Pine Ridge Dairy Road and West of Brookstone Lane, Petitioner: Peterson & Myers, PA (Shelton Rice) on behalf of the owner, Pine Ridge Park L. Source
2025-07-10 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Ordinance 2025-009 on first reading, as previously cited. Vote 3-0. Source
2025-07-10 Second
Seconded; the council to approve Ordinance 2025-010 on first reading, as previously cited. Mayor Cheshire opened the public hearing July 10, 2025, City Commission Minutes -Page 7 of 10 Ms. Geraci-Carver noted that the revision concerning limited access to Pine Ridge Dairy Road was included in Section Ten of the MDA, and she read the revision. Vice Mayor DeGrave asked if the MDA obligated a western connection through the church property. Ms. Geraci-Carver said it mandated access to the north, which is church property. Mayor Cheshire wondered if after the traffic study is complete, the developer could request a change to allow for reopening the development to Pine Ridge Dairy Road. Vote 3-0. Source
2025-07-10 Motion
Moved; the council to approve Resolution 2025-039. Vote 3-0. Source
2025-06-26 Second
Seconded; the council to TABLE the regular agenda items b - e, related to Urick and Wilder. Source
2025-06-26 Second
Seconded; the council to appoint Commissioner Cosenza as the MPO Governing Board member. Source

Dated public-record events, each with its source. Opinions and private life are out of scope.